SYSTEM ACTIVE
HomeAgentsAutoGPT

AutoGPT

Significant Gravitas

68·Adequate

Overall Trust Score

Autonomous AI agent that attempts to achieve user-defined goals by breaking them into sub-tasks, using internet access, memory management, and file operations. Pioneered the autonomous agent paradigm.

autonomous
experimental
open-source
Version: 0.6.36
Last Evaluated: November 9, 2025
Official Website →

Trust Vector

Performance & Reliability

68
task completion accuracy
65
Methodology
Based on community feedback and testing
Evidence
Community Reports
Task completion highly variable, works better for well-defined goals
Date: 2024-09-25
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
tool use reliability
72
Methodology
Tool integration testing
Evidence
AutoGPT Plugins
Plugin system for tools, reliability varies by plugin
Date: 2024-10-01
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
multi step planning
70
Methodology
Complex task testing
Evidence
Autonomous Planning
Can plan multi-step tasks but may lose focus on complex goals
Date: 2024-09-15
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
memory persistence
75
Methodology
Memory system evaluation
Evidence
Memory System
Vector-based long-term memory with local storage
Date: 2024-10-01
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
error recovery
62
Methodology
Error handling testing
Evidence
User Feedback
Limited error recovery, can get stuck in loops
Date: 2024-09-20
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
autonomy level
78
Methodology
Autonomy assessment
Evidence
Autonomous Operation
High autonomy with continuous mode for unattended operation
Date: 2024-10-01
Confidence: highLast verified: 2025-11-09

Security

62
tool sandboxing
58
Methodology
Security architecture review
Evidence
Architecture Review
Limited sandboxing, can execute arbitrary code and file operations
Date: 2024-10-01
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
access control
65
Methodology
Access control assessment
Evidence
Configuration
Basic access controls via configuration, requires careful setup
Date: 2024-10-01
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
prompt injection defense
60
Methodology
Injection attack testing
Evidence
Security Concerns
Vulnerable to prompt injection due to autonomous nature
Date: 2024-09-15
Confidence: lowLast verified: 2025-11-09
data isolation
68
Methodology
Data architecture review
Evidence
Local Storage
Data stored locally per agent instance
Date: 2024-10-01
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
open source transparency
92
Methodology
Source code review
Evidence
GitHub Repository
MIT licensed, 165k+ stars, fully transparent code
Date: 2024-10-15
Confidence: highLast verified: 2025-11-09

Privacy & Compliance

70
data retention
75
Methodology
Privacy architecture review
Evidence
Local Operation
Data stored locally, full user control
Date: 2024-10-01
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
gdpr compliance
68
Methodology
Compliance capabilities assessment
Evidence
Self-Hosted
GDPR compliance possible but requires careful configuration
Date: 2024-10-01
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
third party data sharing
65
Methodology
Data flow analysis
Evidence
LLM Integration
Data sent to OpenAI API and potentially web services accessed
Date: 2024-10-01
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
local deployment option
78
Methodology
Deployment options assessment
Evidence
Local LLM Support
Can work with local LLMs but optimized for OpenAI
Date: 2024-10-01
Confidence: highLast verified: 2025-11-09

Trust & Transparency

76
documentation quality
72
Methodology
Documentation completeness review
Evidence
AutoGPT Docs
Documentation available but can be sparse for advanced features
Date: 2024-10-15
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
execution traceability
74
Methodology
Logging capabilities assessment
Evidence
Logging Features
Basic logging of agent actions and thoughts
Date: 2024-10-01
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
decision explainability
76
Methodology
Explainability features assessment
Evidence
Agent Thoughts
Agent 'thoughts' provide some insight into reasoning
Date: 2024-10-01
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
open source code
92
Methodology
Open source assessment
Evidence
GitHub Repository
MIT licensed, 165k+ stars, pioneering autonomous agent project
Date: 2024-10-15
Confidence: highLast verified: 2025-11-09
community activity
65
Methodology
Community engagement analysis
Evidence
GitHub Activity
Activity has decreased from peak, focus shifting to AutoGPT Platform
Date: 2024-10-15
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09

Operational Excellence

65
ease of integration
70
Methodology
Integration complexity assessment
Evidence
Setup Guide
Setup can be complex with multiple dependencies
Date: 2024-10-01
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
scalability
62
Methodology
Scalability testing
Evidence
Architecture Limitations
Not designed for high-scale production deployments
Date: 2024-09-15
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
cost predictability
60
Methodology
Cost analysis
Evidence
Token Usage
Autonomous operation can lead to unpredictable token consumption
Date: 2024-09-20
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
Note: Can rack up significant API costs in continuous mode
monitoring capabilities
65
Methodology
Monitoring features assessment
Evidence
Monitoring Features
Basic monitoring through logs, limited production tooling
Date: 2024-10-01
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
production readiness
58
Methodology
Production readiness assessment
Evidence
Project Status
More experimental than production-ready, better for research
Date: 2024-10-01
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09

✨ Strengths

  • Pioneered the autonomous agent paradigm and concept
  • High level of autonomy for unattended task execution
  • Massive community interest and open source transparency
  • Good for experimentation and research into agent capabilities
  • Local deployment with full user control
  • Internet access and file operation capabilities

⚠️ Limitations

  • Unpredictable behavior and task completion reliability
  • Significant security concerns with broad permissions
  • High and unpredictable API costs in autonomous mode
  • Can get stuck in loops or lose focus on goals
  • Not production-ready for critical applications
  • Limited enterprise features and compliance capabilities

📊 Metadata

license: MIT
supported models:
0: OpenAI GPT-4
1: GPT-3.5
2: Local LLMs (experimental)
programming languages:
0: Python
deployment type: Self-hosted
tool support:
0: Web browsing
1: File operations
2: Code execution
3: Plugins
github stars: 180000+
first release: 2023
latest release: autogpt-platform-beta-v0.6.36 (November 2025)

Use Case Ratings

customer support

62

Too autonomous and unpredictable for customer-facing applications

code generation

68

Can generate code but may lack consistency and quality controls

research assistant

72

Can perform research tasks but results quality varies

data analysis

65

Limited data analysis capabilities, better tools available

content creation

70

Can create content but quality control challenging

education

58

Too unpredictable for educational applications

healthcare

35

Not suitable for healthcare due to security and reliability concerns

financial analysis

40

Insufficient security and compliance features for financial services

legal compliance

45

Too unpredictable and lacks necessary security for legal work

creative writing

75

Experimental nature can be useful for creative exploration