SYSTEM ACTIVE
HomeAgentsBabyAGI

BabyAGI

Yohei Nakajima

66·Adequate

Overall Trust Score

Minimalist autonomous task-driven AI agent that creates, prioritizes, and executes tasks based on results of previous tasks and a predefined objective. Demonstrates AGI concepts in under 200 lines of code.

autonomous
experimental
open-source
Version: Classic
Last Evaluated: November 9, 2025
Official Website →

Trust Vector

Performance & Reliability

64
task completion accuracy
62
Methodology
Based on community testing and demonstrations
Evidence
Community Experiments
Task completion highly dependent on goal clarity and complexity
Date: 2024-08-20
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
tool use reliability
68
Methodology
Tool integration assessment
Evidence
Tool Integration
Limited tool support in classic version, extensions add capabilities
Date: 2024-09-01
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
multi step planning
72
Methodology
Planning capability testing
Evidence
Task Management System
Creates and manages task list based on objective
Date: 2024-09-01
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
memory persistence
70
Methodology
Memory system evaluation
Evidence
Pinecone Integration
Vector database (Pinecone) for task context storage
Date: 2024-09-01
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
error recovery
55
Methodology
Error handling testing
Evidence
Code Review
Minimal error handling, can fail or loop indefinitely
Date: 2024-09-01
Confidence: lowLast verified: 2025-11-09
task generation
75
Methodology
Task generation assessment
Evidence
Task Creation
Can generate new tasks based on results, sometimes overgenerates
Date: 2024-09-01
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09

Security

58
tool sandboxing
52
Methodology
Security architecture review
Evidence
Architecture Review
No sandboxing in classic version, executes tasks via LLM only
Date: 2024-09-01
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
access control
60
Methodology
Access control assessment
Evidence
Simple Architecture
Minimal access control, relies on API key security
Date: 2024-09-01
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
prompt injection defense
55
Methodology
Injection attack testing
Evidence
Security Concerns
Vulnerable to injection through objective and task results
Date: 2024-08-15
Confidence: lowLast verified: 2025-11-09
data isolation
65
Methodology
Data architecture review
Evidence
Vector Database
Namespace-based isolation in Pinecone
Date: 2024-09-01
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
open source transparency
95
Methodology
Source code review
Evidence
GitHub Repository
MIT licensed, 20k+ stars, extremely simple and transparent code
Date: 2024-09-15
Confidence: highLast verified: 2025-11-09

Privacy & Compliance

67
data retention
70
Methodology
Privacy architecture review
Evidence
Pinecone Storage
Data retention controlled by Pinecone configuration
Date: 2024-09-01
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
gdpr compliance
65
Methodology
Compliance capabilities assessment
Evidence
Third-Party Dependencies
GDPR compliance depends on Pinecone and OpenAI configurations
Date: 2024-09-01
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
third party data sharing
62
Methodology
Data flow analysis
Evidence
External Services
Data sent to OpenAI API and Pinecone vector database
Date: 2024-09-01
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
local deployment option
72
Methodology
Deployment options assessment
Evidence
Code Variants
Variants exist for local LLMs but require code modifications
Date: 2024-09-01
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09

Trust & Transparency

82
documentation quality
70
Methodology
Documentation completeness review
Evidence
README Documentation
Basic README, code is self-documenting due to simplicity
Date: 2024-09-15
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
execution traceability
78
Methodology
Logging capabilities assessment
Evidence
Console Output
Prints task execution to console with results
Date: 2024-09-01
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
decision explainability
80
Methodology
Explainability features assessment
Evidence
Task Visibility
Task list and results visible, shows reasoning for new tasks
Date: 2024-09-01
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
open source code
98
Methodology
Open source assessment
Evidence
GitHub Repository
MIT licensed, 20k+ stars, under 200 lines of highly readable code
Date: 2024-09-15
Confidence: highLast verified: 2025-11-09
code simplicity
95
Methodology
Code complexity analysis
Evidence
Source Code
Remarkably simple implementation, easy to understand and modify
Date: 2024-09-01
Confidence: highLast verified: 2025-11-09

Operational Excellence

61
ease of integration
75
Methodology
Integration complexity assessment
Evidence
Setup Instructions
Very simple setup, just API keys and Python dependencies
Date: 2024-09-01
Confidence: highLast verified: 2025-11-09
scalability
55
Methodology
Scalability testing
Evidence
Architecture Limitations
Not designed for production scale, single-threaded execution
Date: 2024-09-01
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
cost predictability
58
Methodology
Cost analysis
Evidence
Token Usage
Can generate many tasks leading to unpredictable API costs
Date: 2024-08-20
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
Note: Task generation can spiral, accumulating costs
monitoring capabilities
60
Methodology
Monitoring features assessment
Evidence
Logging Features
Basic console output, no production monitoring tools
Date: 2024-09-01
Confidence: mediumLast verified: 2025-11-09
production readiness
50
Methodology
Production readiness assessment
Evidence
Project Purpose
Designed as concept demonstration, not production system
Date: 2024-09-01
Confidence: highLast verified: 2025-11-09

✨ Strengths

  • Extremely simple and elegant demonstration of AGI concepts
  • Under 200 lines of code, easy to understand and modify
  • Pioneered task-driven autonomous agent approach
  • Great educational tool for learning agent concepts
  • Open source with complete transparency
  • Low barrier to entry for experimentation

⚠️ Limitations

  • Not production-ready, designed as concept demonstration
  • Minimal error handling and recovery capabilities
  • Can generate excessive tasks leading to high costs
  • No built-in security or sandboxing features
  • Limited tool integration in classic version
  • Unpredictable behavior and task completion quality

📊 Metadata

license: MIT
supported models:
0: OpenAI GPT-4
1: GPT-3.5
2: GPT-3
programming languages:
0: Python
deployment type: Self-hosted (local script)
tool support:
0: Limited, primarily LLM-based task execution
github stars: 20737+
first release: 2023
code lines: ~140 (classic version)
status: Archived as of September 2024

Use Case Ratings

customer support

45

Too unpredictable and experimental for customer support

code generation

55

Limited code generation capabilities, lacks necessary tools

research assistant

68

Can break down research tasks but execution quality varies

data analysis

50

Minimal data analysis capabilities in classic version

content creation

60

Can generate content tasks but quality control challenging

education

52

Too experimental for educational applications

healthcare

25

Completely unsuitable for healthcare due to reliability concerns

financial analysis

30

Lacks security, compliance, and reliability for financial use

legal compliance

35

Too unreliable for legal work requiring accuracy

creative writing

78

Best suited for creative exploration and concept generation