MCP Git Server

v2025.9.25

Anthropic

MCPgitversion-controlmcpmodel-context-protocol
80
Strong
About This MCP

Official Anthropic MCP server for Git repository operations. Enables AI models to interact with local Git repositories, perform commits, branch management, and version control operations. Essential for AI-assisted development workflows and code management.

Last Evaluated: November 9, 2025
Official Website

Trust Vector Analysis

Dimension Breakdown

🚀Performance & Reliability
+
git operation success rate

Operation success testing

Evidence
MCP Git Server — Reliable Git operations using native Git CLI or libraries
highVerified: 2025-11-09
repository parsing accuracy

Parsing accuracy assessment

Evidence
Git Implementation — Uses standard Git tools for accurate repository analysis
highVerified: 2025-11-09
large repository handling

Scalability testing

Evidence
Implementation Review — Performance may degrade with very large repositories (>100k commits)
mediumVerified: 2025-11-09
merge conflict handling

Conflict handling testing

Evidence
Git Conflict Resolution — Properly detects and reports merge conflicts for manual resolution
highVerified: 2025-11-09
error recovery

Error handling testing

Evidence
MCP Implementation — Graceful error handling with detailed error messages
highVerified: 2025-11-09
🛡️Security
+
repository access control

Access control testing

Evidence
File System Permissions — Respects local file system permissions but AI can access any readable repo
highVerified: 2025-11-09
destructive operation risk

Operation authorization testing

Evidence
Security Analysis — AI can perform force pushes, branch deletions, and history rewrites
highVerified: 2025-11-09
credential exposure risk

Credential security analysis

Evidence
Git Credential Storage — Uses local Git credentials; potential for accidental exposure to LLM
mediumVerified: 2025-11-09
commit signing support

Signing capability review

Evidence
Git Commit Signing — Supports GPG signing if configured in local Git setup
mediumVerified: 2025-11-09
branch protection respect

Protection mechanism testing

Evidence
Implementation Review — Local operations only; remote branch protections enforced by remote server
mediumVerified: 2025-11-09
🔒Privacy & Compliance
+
code exposure

Data flow analysis

Evidence
MCP Data Flow — Repository content and commit history sent to LLM provider
highVerified: 2025-11-09
sensitive data detection

Privacy controls assessment

Evidence
Security Analysis — No built-in secret detection; risk of exposing API keys in commits
mediumVerified: 2025-11-09
commit history privacy

History privacy review

Evidence
Git Log Access — Full commit history including author names and emails accessible
highVerified: 2025-11-09
third party data sharing

Data sharing analysis

Evidence
LLM Provider Policies — Repository data shared with LLM provider per their privacy policy
highVerified: 2025-11-09
gitignore respect

File filtering assessment

Evidence
Implementation Review — Respects .gitignore for operations but can still read ignored files
mediumVerified: 2025-11-09
👁️Trust & Transparency
+
documentation quality

Documentation completeness review

Evidence
MCP Git Docs — Comprehensive documentation with examples and best practices
highVerified: 2025-11-09
operation visibility

Logging and traceability assessment

Evidence
Git and MCP Logging — All operations logged in MCP and Git reflog provides full audit trail
highVerified: 2025-11-09
open source transparency

Source code review

Evidence
GitHub Repository — Fully open source implementation with MIT license
highVerified: 2025-11-09
command coverage clarity

API documentation review

Evidence
MCP Server Documentation — Clear documentation of supported Git commands and operations
mediumVerified: 2025-11-09
⚙️Operational Excellence
+
ease of setup

Setup complexity assessment

Evidence
MCP Setup Guide — Simple setup requiring only Git installation on local system
highVerified: 2025-11-09
operation performance

Performance benchmarking

Evidence
Git Performance — Fast operations for most repos; performance depends on repository size
mediumVerified: 2025-11-09
reliability

Stability analysis

Evidence
Git Stability — Built on mature, battle-tested Git tooling
highVerified: 2025-11-09
feature coverage

Feature completeness assessment

Evidence
MCP Git Server — Covers commits, branches, logs, diffs, and most common Git operations
highVerified: 2025-11-09
community adoption

Community activity analysis

Evidence
GitHub Community — Popular MCP server for development workflows
mediumVerified: 2025-11-09
Strengths
  • +Comprehensive Git operation support (commits, branches, merges, logs)
  • +Built on mature and reliable Git infrastructure
  • +Excellent for development workflows and version control automation
  • +Full operation auditability through Git reflog and MCP logs
  • +Open source implementation with active Anthropic support
  • +Simple setup requiring only local Git installation
Limitations
  • !Repository code and history exposed to LLM provider APIs
  • !Risk of destructive operations (force push, branch deletion, history rewrite)
  • !No built-in secret detection or sensitive data filtering
  • !Can access Git credentials stored on local system
  • !Performance may degrade with very large repositories
  • !No safeguards against accidental commits or pushes
Metadata
license: MIT
supported platforms
0: All platforms with Git installed
programming languages
0: TypeScript
1: Python
mcp version: 1.0
github repo: https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/servers
github stars: 58700
api dependency: Git CLI
authentication: Uses local Git credentials
first release: 2024-11
maintained by: Anthropic
status: Official - Active
transport types
0: stdio
installation methods
0: npm

Use Case Ratings

code generation

Excellent for AI-assisted development with version control integration

customer support

Limited applicability; mainly useful for technical support on code repositories

content creation

Good for managing documentation and content versioning in Git

data analysis

Useful for analyzing commit history, code churn, and repository metrics

research assistant

Great for researching code history, finding changes, and tracking evolution

legal compliance

Risk of exposing proprietary code; requires careful access controls

healthcare

Low suitability due to risk of exposing sensitive healthcare code

financial analysis

Moderate risk; requires careful repository access controls

education

Excellent for teaching Git, version control, and collaborative development

creative writing

Good for version controlling writing projects and tracking revisions