GPT-5.6 (Sol / Terra / Luna) is now evaluated on TrustVector โ€” with day-1 independent verification, incl. METR's benchmark-cheating findings.

Read the evaluation
Evaluation record ยท glm-5-2

GLM-5.2

v20260613

Z.ai (Zhipu AI)

Modelcodingreasoningopen-sourcemit-license
82
Strong
About This Model

Z.ai's MIT-licensed 744B-parameter MoE (40B active) launched June 2026 with a 1M-token context via IndexShare sparse attention. Leading open-weight model on Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 (51), with 62.1 SWE-bench Pro, 81.0 Terminal-Bench 2.1, and 99.2% AIME 2026 at $1.40/$4.40 per 1M tokens. Weights published 2026-06-16.

Last Evaluated: July 9, 2026
Official Website

Trust Vector Analysis

Dimension Breakdown

๐Ÿš€Performance & Reliability
+

Strongest open-weight release to date on independent measures: leads Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 (51) and GDPval-AA v2, 62.1 SWE-bench Pro, 81.0 Terminal-Bench 2.1, 99.2% AIME 2026. Launch recency (June 2026) limits consistency, latency, and uptime confidence; the model is notably token-hungry.

task accuracy code

Vendor benchmarks corroborated by independent leaderboards (Artificial Analysis, Code Arena) within weeks of launch

Evidence
GLM-5.2 Model Card โ€” 62.1 SWE-bench Pro (top open-weight, just behind Claude Opus 4.8), 81.0 Terminal-Bench 2.1
Artificial Analysis / Code Arena โ€” 2nd on Code Arena WebDev leaderboard, behind only Claude Fable 5; leads open weights on GDPval-AA v2 agentic benchmark, roughly level with GPT-5.5 xhigh
VentureBeat launch coverage โ€” Beats GPT-5.5 on multiple long-horizon coding benchmarks at roughly 1/6th the cost
highVerified: 2026-07-09
task accuracy reasoning

Vendor-reported competition and graduate-level reasoning benchmarks; broad independent replication still pending given launch recency

Evidence
GLM-5.2 Model Card โ€” 99.2% AIME 2026, 91.2% GPQA-Diamond, 40.5 Humanity's Last Exam (54.7 with tools)
mediumVerified: 2026-07-09
task accuracy general

Independent composite benchmarking and third-party hands-on evaluation

Evidence
Artificial Analysis โ€” Leading open-weights model on Intelligence Index v4.1 with a score of 51
Simon Willison review โ€” "Probably the most powerful text-only open weights LLM"; strong independent hands-on results
highVerified: 2026-07-09
output consistency

Early community testing with repeated prompts; limited observation window since June 2026 launch

Evidence
Simon Willison review โ€” Stable results across tasks but token-hungry (~43K output tokens per benchmark task vs 24-37K for peers); only weeks of community testing so far
mediumVerified: 2026-07-09
latency p50

Early median latency observations; limited data given launch recency

Evidence
Artificial Analysis โ€” IndexShare keeps 1M-context inference manageable (2.9x per-token FLOP reduction), but high reasoning-token usage lengthens end-to-end completions
lowVerified: 2026-07-09
latency p95

95th percentile response time from early third-party measurements

Evidence
Community benchmarking โ€” p95 ~7.0s; long-context and heavy-reasoning requests run substantially longer
lowVerified: 2026-07-09
context window

Official specification from model card

Evidence
GLM-5.2 Model Card โ€” 1M-token context window (5x GLM-5.1's 200K) with up to 131,072 output tokens (163,840 for reasoning)
highVerified: 2026-07-09
uptime

Review of platform availability since launch; observation window under one month

Evidence
Z.ai Platform โ€” First-party API stable in first weeks; open weights enable self-hosted redundancy, but no long-run availability record yet
lowVerified: 2026-07-09
๐Ÿ›ก๏ธSecurity
+

Inherits the GLM family's solid-but-unaudited open-model posture. No third-party security audit yet; the model is under a month old, so red-team coverage is thin. Self-hosting shifts responsibility to the deployer.

prompt injection resistance

Review of safety documentation and GLM-family precedent against OWASP LLM01 patterns; model too new for mature red-team coverage

Evidence
GLM-5.2 Model Card โ€” Safety tuning consistent with GLM-5/5.1 lineage; no dedicated third-party injection audit published for GLM-5.2 yet
lowVerified: 2026-07-09
jailbreak resistance

Early testing against adversarial prompt datasets; deployer-dependent for self-hosted use

Evidence
Community red-teaming โ€” Standard alignment; open weights allow guardrail removal in derivatives; limited adversarial testing published since launch
lowVerified: 2026-07-09
data leakage prevention

Analysis of privacy policies and self-hosting data-control options

Evidence
Z.ai Privacy Policy โ€” Standard data handling on first-party API; full control when self-hosted
mediumVerified: 2026-07-09
output safety

Safety testing across harmful content categories, anchored to GLM-family precedent

Evidence
GLM-5.2 Model Card โ€” Safety post-training; refusal behavior in line with GLM-5/5.1 and peer open frontier models
mediumVerified: 2026-07-09
api security

Review of API security features and best practices

Evidence
Z.ai API Documentation โ€” API key authentication, HTTPS only, rate limiting; OpenAI-compatible endpoints shared with the GLM-5 family
mediumVerified: 2026-07-09
๐Ÿ”’Privacy & Compliance
+

Same posture as GLM-5: first-party API under Chinese jurisdiction is a material caveat for Western regulated industries, cleanly mitigated by the unencumbered MIT weights via self-hosting or Western hosts.

data residency

Review of provider jurisdiction and third-party hosting options

Evidence
Z.ai Platform Documentation โ€” Zhipu/Z.ai is a China-based provider; first-party API data processed under Chinese jurisdiction
OpenRouter availability โ€” MIT weights hosted by Western inference providers (OpenRouter, DeepInfra, Featherless), enabling non-China residency
mediumVerified: 2026-07-09
training data optout

Analysis of privacy policy and data usage terms

Evidence
Z.ai Privacy Policy โ€” Standard API data terms unchanged from GLM-5/5.1; self-hosting removes the concern entirely
mediumVerified: 2026-07-09
data retention

Review of terms of service and deployment-dependent retention

Evidence
Z.ai Terms of Service โ€” First-party retention governed by Chinese data regulations; self-hosted deployments retain nothing externally
mediumVerified: 2026-07-09
pii handling

Review of data protection capabilities and customer responsibilities

Evidence
Z.ai Documentation โ€” Customer responsible for PII redaction; no managed PII tooling
mediumVerified: 2026-07-09
compliance certifications

Verification of compliance certifications and audit reports

Evidence
Z.ai public materials โ€” No published SOC 2 / HIPAA / GDPR attestations for the first-party API; Western hosts may carry their own certifications
mediumVerified: 2026-07-09
zero data retention

Review of self-hosting deployment options enabling zero retention

Evidence
Open weights on Hugging Face โ€” MIT-licensed self-hosting gives complete data control and zero external retention; BF16 deployment needs over 1TB of GPU VRAM
mediumVerified: 2026-07-09
๐Ÿ‘๏ธTrust & Transparency
+

Strong architectural transparency (IndexShare, MTP, benchmark tables) with rapid independent verification by Artificial Analysis and community reviewers. Training data detail is thinner than GLM-5's, and bias/safety evaluations remain unpublished. Note vendor materials cite 753B total parameters while Artificial Analysis lists 744B/40B active; active-parameter count is consistent across sources.

explainability

Evaluation of reasoning transparency and trajectory inspectability

Evidence
GLM-5.2 documentation โ€” Reasoning traces and agentic tool-call logs inspectable; up to 163,840 reasoning output tokens exposed to the caller
mediumVerified: 2026-07-09
hallucination rate

Inference from grounded agentic benchmarks; limited dedicated factual-QA data given launch recency

Evidence
Artificial Analysis GDPval-AA v2 โ€” Leads open weights on real-world agentic benchmark, indicating disciplined grounded behavior; dedicated factuality studies not yet published
mediumVerified: 2026-07-09
bias fairness

Review of published bias benchmarks and community evaluations

Evidence
GLM-5.2 Model Card โ€” Limited published bias evaluation
lowVerified: 2026-07-09
uncertainty quantification

Qualitative assessment of confidence expression in outputs

Evidence
Model behavior testing โ€” Expresses uncertainty adequately; no calibrated confidence outputs; limited testing since launch
lowVerified: 2026-07-09
model card quality

Review of documentation completeness and clarity

Evidence
Hugging Face model card โ€” Detailed disclosure: MoE architecture, IndexShare sparse attention (2.9x per-token FLOP reduction at 1M context), improved MTP speculative decoding, full benchmark tables, deployment guides
highVerified: 2026-07-09
training data transparency

Review of public disclosures about training data

Evidence
GLM-5.2 technical disclosure โ€” Architecture and training recipe outlined in the GLM technical report lineage; pretraining token count and data sources not disclosed for 5.2
mediumVerified: 2026-07-09
guardrails

Analysis of built-in safety mechanisms

Evidence
GLM-5.2 Model Card โ€” Built-in safety tuning; deployers of open weights must layer their own guardrails
mediumVerified: 2026-07-09
โš™๏ธOperational Excellence
+

Clean MIT licensing and fast third-party host adoption. The family's rapid release cadence (three flagships in five months) remains the main operational overhead; ecosystem depth for 5.2 specifically is still building given the mid-June weights release.

api design quality

Review of API design, consistency, and feature completeness

Evidence
Z.ai API Documentation โ€” OpenAI-compatible API with streaming, tool calling, structured output; same interface as the rest of the GLM-5 family
highVerified: 2026-07-09
sdk quality

Review of SDK quality, documentation, and maintenance

Evidence
Z.ai GitHub organization โ€” Official repos with deployment recipes; OpenAI-compatible so mainstream SDKs work; Z.ai coding CLI with promotional free-token allowance
mediumVerified: 2026-07-09
versioning policy

Review of versioning practices and weight availability across releases

Evidence
GLM release history โ€” Third flagship in five months (GLM-5 Feb, GLM-5.1 Mar/Apr, GLM-5.2 Jun); prior weights remain available, but the cadence creates version-tracking overhead
GLM-5.2 launch coverage โ€” API launched 2026-06-13; open weights followed 2026-06-16 as promised
mediumVerified: 2026-07-09
monitoring observability

Review of available monitoring tools and metrics

Evidence
Z.ai Platform โ€” Basic usage dashboard; self-hosted observability is deployer-built
mediumVerified: 2026-07-09
support quality

Assessment of documentation, community, and support responsiveness

Evidence
Z.ai community channels โ€” Active GitHub support and documentation; limited English-language enterprise support
mediumVerified: 2026-07-09
ecosystem maturity

Analysis of third-party hosting, integrations, and tooling; conservative given under a month since weights release

Evidence
Inference ecosystem โ€” Day-one SGLang/vLLM/Transformers/KTransformers support plus Ascend NPU; already on OpenRouter, DeepInfra, and Featherless within weeks โ€” though the hosting ecosystem is younger than GLM-5's
mediumVerified: 2026-07-09
license terms

Review of licensing terms and restrictions

Evidence
MIT License โ€” Unencumbered MIT license โ€” "no regional limits"; unrestricted commercial use and derivatives
highVerified: 2026-07-09
Strengths
  • +Leading open-weight model on independent measures: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 (51) and GDPval-AA v2
  • +Top open-weight coding results: 62.1 SWE-bench Pro, 81.0 Terminal-Bench 2.1, 2nd on Code Arena WebDev
  • +1M-token context (5x GLM-5.1) made affordable by IndexShare sparse attention (2.9x FLOP reduction)
  • +Unencumbered MIT license with weights published three days after API launch
  • +Frontier-competitive reasoning: 99.2% AIME 2026, 91.2% GPQA-Diamond, 54.7 HLE-with-tools
  • +Roughly 1/6th the cost of GPT-5.5 at $1.40/$4.40 per 1M tokens
Limitations
  • !First-party Z.ai API processes data under Chinese jurisdiction with limited Western compliance certifications
  • !Token-hungry: ~43K output tokens per benchmark task vs 24-37K for peers, inflating effective cost and latency
  • !Text-only โ€” no vision or audio modalities
  • !Under a month old: consistency, uptime, and security evidence still immature
  • !Limited published bias, safety, and red-team evaluations
  • !Self-hosting requires over 1TB of GPU VRAM in BF16
  • !Parameter count reported inconsistently (744B by Artificial Analysis vs 753B in vendor materials)
Metadata
pricing
input: $1.40 per 1M tokens ($0.26 cache hit)
output: $4.40 per 1M tokens
notes: First-party Z.ai API pricing at launch, confirmed July 2026. OpenRouter routes from ~$1.00/$4.00; DeepInfra ~$1.20/$4.10-4.20 (fp4). Pricier than GLM-5 ($0.60/$1.92) but roughly 1/6th of GPT-5.5.
last verified: 2026-07-09
context window: 1000000
languages
0: English
1: Chinese
2: Japanese
3: Korean
4: Spanish
5: French
6: German
modalities
0: text
api endpoint: https://api.z.ai/api/paas/v4/chat/completions
open source: true
license: MIT
architecture: Mixture-of-Experts: 744B total (vendor cites 753B) / 40B active parameters, IndexShare sparse attention (indexer shared across every four sparse-attention layers), improved MTP speculative decoding
parameters: 744B total / 40B active
release date: 2026-06-13

Use Case Ratings

code generation

Top open-weight coding model: 62.1 SWE-bench Pro and 81.0 Terminal-Bench 2.1, just behind Claude Opus 4.8, with a 400K coding context at 1/6th GPT-5.5's cost.

customer support

Capable and inexpensive, but token-hungry reasoning is wasteful for simple support flows.

content creation

Strong long-form generation with 1M context for whole-corpus grounding.

data analysis

Near-perfect competition math (99.2% AIME 2026) and leading agentic benchmark results for analysis pipelines.

research assistant

Leads open weights on GDPval-AA v2; 1M-token context handles entire document collections in one pass.

legal compliance

China-jurisdiction first-party API and absent Western certifications are blockers unless self-hosted; 1M context is attractive for contract corpora once mitigated.

healthcare

Not recommended via first-party API; self-hosted deployment in a compliant environment is the only viable path.

financial analysis

Top-tier quantitative reasoning; regulated firms should self-host or use certified Western hosts.

education

Outstanding math and science tutoring (99.2% AIME, 91.2% GPQA-Diamond); pricier than GLM-5 but still budget-friendly.

creative writing

Competent prose; optimized for coding and agentic work rather than creative style.